now accepted blame Microsoft for these or other failures. This is not surprising, because large companies have been criticized at all times. Big Money few people indifferent. A budget is Microsoft just huge, it is more of the budget of many countries. Hence, go and talk about what the company pursues only for profits, not paying attention to the buyer. These statements in themselves, without context, they sound pretty strange, because no one company can not achieve any meaningful success without regard to demand and tastes of potential buyers. Now Microsoft has become a kind of empire that not only develops integrated software solutions, but also quite interesting devices, among which, of course we can not identify the XBox 360, which became quite widespread popularity, and for good reason.
Of course, we can not forget about the many failures of the company (for example, in the case of the notorious Vist’oy or with the first batch of the infamous console). We can not, of course, say that these lapses forgivable company with such a huge budget, and, respectively, and the capacity to develop and fine-tuning of competent both software and hardware solutions. But some of Microsoft’s decision can still be understood, though not justified. For example, it is necessary to say that her position among the other companies of similar trends can only instill a sense of respect. The company’s management may be somewhat departed from the practice of introducing radically new ideas. Now we can only see remakes of previous products from Microsoft. This happened most likely because the company needed a break, she needs new ideas that have not yet generated. Even many of the expected Windows 8 is essentially a remake of the previous one-seventh of the system. This can be called the preparation for new solutions, and can be baptized and creative stupor.
It should also be noted that while the company to take action that makes a little. She already holds a leading position in the world of IT, finalized its products, brought them to a different level of implementation, and freed from annoying flaws, the most pressing in the old days. By itself, this “stagnation” is not very good, and says more about what the company has achieved almost everything he wanted. This is a “tired” of the Microsoft enterprise can do a disservice to the future. Indeed, without the planned development of any enterprise is beginning to follow the path of creative and technological exhaustion. Stagnation has never led to anything good. All the products the company announced no value as something that carries into the world of IT ideas and enriching it with a new understanding of familiar things.
Meanwhile, many companies are now able to compete with Microsoft is due to the fact that they regularly provide any new technical solutions to attract the attention of potential buyers. Now comes the development of technology products to the intensive path, and Microsoft simply must take this into account.


Microsoft has finally inked the deal with Yahoo to take on the might of Google. The deal is interesting if not intriguing. Yahoo had resisted the moves of Microsoft to buy it out. Then waited for Microsoft to launch its own search engine Bing and contrary to public declarations from Microsoft, held its own against Microsoft. So is the present deal better than the $44 Billion that Microsoft initially offered?